Early Bird Pricing Ends Soon for Sughrue’s 2026 IP Insights Seminar! Click here for more information.

Skip NavigationSughrue Mion PLLC's logo

Mr. Rachuba zealously advocates for and advises clients on litigation/inter partes review strategies, patent portfolio management, and infringement matters. He has extensive experience in complex patent litigation, and has lead cases from inception, managing all aspects of pleadings, fact and expert discovery, and motion practice. Roman has a deep background in coordinating contentious and complex discovery matters and delivers persuasive oral arguments that clearly and engagingly convey intricate legal concepts. Mr. Rachuba was a key member of a trial team that secured a favorable settlement for a defendant in the middle of trial in a nine-figure patent infringement case. He also lead an inter partes review case that secured a favorable finding of invalidity. He is a member of Sughrue’s Publications Committee, and a contributing author in the ABA’s Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook (Fifth Edition) and the ABA’s The Essential Case Law Guide to PTAB Trials.

Roman leverages his technical background in mechanical engineering to counsel clients in a wide range of technologies and industries including: video and graphic compression; surveillance and security software; speech synthesis; error detection software; information security; systems control algorithms; point of sale systems and software; telecommunications devices; semiconductors; electric, hybrid, autonomous, and internal combustion vehicles; lithium ion batteries; medical devices; power tools; space systems; and heavy industry equipment.

Prior to joining Sughrue, Mr. Rachuba interned for the Honorable Marvin J. Garbis in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, assisting with multiple patent litigations. He also clerked for an export compliance boutique, where he aided in counseling clients on U.S. Depart of Commerce software encryption controls.

Education

  • University of Baltimore (J.D., summa cum laude)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (B.S.M.E.)

Bar Admissions

  • Maryland
  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • U.S. District Court – Western District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court – Delaware
  • U.S. District Court – Eastern District of Michigan
  • U.S. District Court – Middle District of North Carolina
  • U.S. District Court - Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court - Northern District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court - Southern District of Ohio
  • U.S. District Court - New Jersey

Experience

  • Ideavillage v. Hye Jung Yang et al,  CA No. 2:24-07657 (DNJ 2024)
  • Ingenus Pharmaceuticals, LLC. v. Hetero USA, Inc. et al., CA No. 1:24-cv-01025 (DNJ 2024)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc., CAFC-24-2218 (CAFC 2024)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc., CAFC-24-2219 (CAFC 2024)
  • Ingenus Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al. v. Accord Healthcare, Inc., CA No. 1:23-cv-0037 (DED 2023)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. Box, Inc., CA No. 6:23-cv-00063 (NDCA 2023)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. Dropbox, Inc., CA No. 6:23-cv-00062 (NDCA 2023)
  • Laser Spallation Technologies, LLC v. The Boeing Company, CA No. 2:23-cv-02294 (NDCA 2023)
  • Ingenus Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al. v. Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., CA No. 1:22-cv-02868 (ND IL 2022)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. Egnyte, Inc., CA No. 1:21-cv-01821 (DED 2021)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc., and Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc., CA No. 6:21-cv-01373 (WDTX 2021)
  • Topia Technology, Inc. v. SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc., and Vistra Corp. CA No. 6:21-cv-01372 (WDTX 2021)
  • Glaston Corporation and Uniglass Engineering OY v. HHH Equipment Resources and Salem Fabrication Technologies Group, Inc., CA No. 1:21-cv-00942 (MDNC 2021)
  • Lear Corporation v. NHK Seating of America Inc., et al., CA No. 2:13-cv-12937 (EDMI 2013)
  • The Boeing Company v. The Regents of the University of California, IPR2024-00761 (PTAB 2024)
  • Box, Inc. and Dropbox, Inc. v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2023-00429 (PTAB 2023)
  • Box, Inc. and Dropbox, Inc. v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2023-00430 (PTAB 2023)
  • Box, Inc. and Dropbox, Inc. v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2023-00431 (PTAB 2023)
  • Box, Inc. and Dropbox, Inc. v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2023-00432 (PTAB 2023)
  • Box, Inc. and Dropbox, Inc. v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2023-00433 (PTAB 2023)
  • Box, Inc. and Dropbox, Inc. v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2023-00427 (PTAB 2023)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Shilpa Pharma, Inc., IPR2022-00886 (PTAB 2022)
  • Unified Patents, LLC v. Topia Technology, Inc., IPR2022-00782 (PTAB 2022)
  • Florida Food Products, LLC v. Kerry Group and Kerry Luxembourg S.á.r.l., IPR2022-00006 (PTAB 2022)
  • Unified Patents, LLC v. Ideahub Inc., PGR2022-00044 (PTAB 2022)
  • YKK Corporation v. 3M Innovative Properties Company, IPR2020-00699 (PTAB 2020)
This website does not track your personal or demographic information, only anonymous usage statistics. To ensure that you are not tracked, we have blocked all embedded content from third party sources like YouTube and SlideShare. Click "Accept Cookies" to enable third-party content. To learn more about our cookie policy, click here.